The man’s role as a “consultant” is unmistakably parallel with that of one of the “wise counsellors” prepared in one of their “advanced schools” by the Elders of Zion.Such operators are not-by design-known for their moral authority but for the cunning and hypocrisy with which they pursue the “Administration of the Super Government” (read NWO agenda).

In Pean’s account the NWO agenda is characterised inaccurately as a “larval form of neo-conservatism” pliable to US foreign policy interests.In fact these interests are driven by the invisible government that remains taboo in Pean’s book and in Caldwell’s review of it.

In 1968 Kouchner is described as having been peripheral to events during the May disturbances in Paris.Well of course Pean might have mentioned that Daniel Kohn-Bendit (Danny the Red) was their chosen operator at that time!

Again in 1977 it is conveniently forgotten that Kouchner signed an open letter advocating the legalisation of paedophilia in France.Joined in this venture by such postmodernist pederasts as Foucault,Roland Barthes (who was notorious for his escapades with boys on N.African beaches),Derrida, as well as writers like Robbe-Grillet and Louis Aragon.During the same decade Cohn-Bendit also subscribed to the paedophile cause.

That Kouchner’s career was never on the skids during this decade bespeaks the fact that he and his postmodernist paedo pals had powerful friends.

Sarkozy’s friendship with Liberation owner,Eduardo de Rothschild and willingness to do the bidding of the dynasty’s interests generally must help explain why,at least until Pean’s book neither Sarko nor Kouch have suffered adverse commentary from that source.

Caldwell typically misreports the post-WW2 Red Cross report to which Kouchner took exception as “keeping silent re-Nazi genocide”.Far worse is the fact that the said report flatly rejected the idea that any Holocaust had taken place.They insisted that the cause of the increasing death-rate in the camps at the end of the war was down to the spread of epidemics and Allied bombing!

Through his willingness to collude with the idea that Kouchner acted altruistically in international affairs and MSF,Caldwell misses so obvious signals that Kouchner is a Rothschild agent.How right Pean is to note that the huge oil bonanza in Biafra might also have something to do with his interest in the civil war there.

Again when a President creates a post specifically for someone like Kouchner (or even Brown for Mandelson today) as Mitterrand did in 1988-that too is a sure sign that the man has powerful backers.

On the back of the appointment of Kouchner to the post of “Secretary of State for Humanitarian Affairs” Kouchner was able to engineer the passing of the key 43/13 UN resolution making national sovereignty conditional upon a state’s willingness to submit to Rothchildian plans for intervention,fanning conflict,resource extraction or the establishment of a central reserve bank or all the above!

Noteworthy too is Caldwell’s characteristic corporate journalist’s admission of his lack of expertise when evaluating Pean’s revisionist account of the Rwandan genocide.He wants to keep his FT job of course!

Thus he abjures from any attempt to establish the authenticity of Pean’s claims re-the Habirimana plane shoot-down or even to mention in this connection the claims made by Boutros-Ghali that the CIA was behind this event that triggered the mass killing in 1994.

Far be it for so-called “investigative journalist” to actually investigate!Let alone challenge the establishment narrative on the Rwandan genocide for which Kouchner and the Zionist lobby generally are such avid publicists.

On Kosovo and the Kouchner role as interim governor no mention is made by either writer or reviewer of the participation of Kouchner and the Albanian mafiosi he,Holbrooke and Albright empowered in the province in the international organ trade.

Nor is reference made to the bizarre Sarkozy-Kouchner support for Turkish demands that the new state recognise the cultural and political rights of the Kosovan Turks.

Bizarre because the Turks comprise but a princely 15,000 of the total population.Some context here is needed.Sarkozy is a descendant of Sabbatean Donmeh from Salonica.These were the guys that led the Young Turk revolution and provoked the Armenian genocide.

But like Caldwell and Pean we’re only allowed to talk about certain “genocides”.The Nazi one and the Hutu ones for example.

Finally the central thesis of the book that Kouchner has enabled changes in the whole system of nation states is not scrutinised so as to enable readers to decide just who these changes actually benefit.The weakening of nation states in favour of transnational structures like the EU,UN and ICC are NWO objectives plain and simple.

Rothschild agents have been adept at effecting such changes to the international order by their ubiquitous presence at peace negotiations since Waterloo.

No change there then.