In many ways this is a reflection of the flawed and myopic vision of the elites who created it.Dominance of the civil affairs within the state by its Jewish majority was mandated by law when it was created in 1948.Yet the belligerent and intolerant ethno-state that now exists is the very antithesis of Herzl’s vision of a bourgeois secular liberal democracy.

Israeli apartheid is premised on the idea that all its non-Jewish residents are potential anti-semites who endanger their Jewish neighbours.Thus the Palestinians are perceived as a demographic threat.

All of this begs the question can the satanic statelet as it now exists continue to define itself as an exclusively Jewish state and still pretend it is the only democracy in the region?

The Zionist aspiration for an ethno-state in Palestine was predicated on Talmudic teachings re-Jewish exclusivity and supremacy.Israelism among British and US elites who saw themselves as descendants of the lost tribes came to support this aspiration.Elite support also owed not a little to the fact that Zionists controlled their banks as well!

Today the abnormal,anachronistic and apartheid state that now exists in Palestine is probably as distant from the ideal City of God upon a hill as it is possible to get.

For the elites who helped the state into being it was but a vehicle for Anglo-US geostrategic regional domination.They also envisaged the new state as an experiment in elite social engineering,state-building and conflict management.

Longevity was not part of the elite plan.The ramshackle military colony would ultimately likely implode under the weight of its own internal contradictions.

On the ashes of this imploded state the mystical apartheid vision that drove elite masonic Israelism in the first place will be brought into even more sharp relief.

By the way, Ben tells me he’s looking at including a section on Gaza in the (possible) second edition.