<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airport &#8216;Security Measures&#8217; and the Politics of Fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulsemedia.org/2010/01/05/airport-security-measures-and-the-politics-of-fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/01/05/airport-security-measures-and-the-politics-of-fear/</link>
	<description>&#34;Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Avard</title>
		<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/01/05/airport-security-measures-and-the-politics-of-fear/#comment-7144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Avard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulsemedia.org/?p=18528#comment-7144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allow me to plug one of my favorite thinkers who didn&#039;t make the PULSE top-20 thinkers list, not even an honorable mention : ( 

His name is Derrick Jensen, a radical environmentalist/anarcho-primitivist whose writings have been compared to Foucault and Camus. He co-wrote a great book that discusses this particular issue Ann brought up. The book is called (and I&#039;m not kidding on this) &quot;Welcome to the Machine: Science, Surveillance, and the Culture of Control.&quot; Now the book is more important than ever. Check it out. 

http://is.gd/5Nvo6]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to plug one of my favorite thinkers who didn&#8217;t make the PULSE top-20 thinkers list, not even an honorable mention : ( </p>
<p>His name is Derrick Jensen, a radical environmentalist/anarcho-primitivist whose writings have been compared to Foucault and Camus. He co-wrote a great book that discusses this particular issue Ann brought up. The book is called (and I&#8217;m not kidding on this) &#8220;Welcome to the Machine: Science, Surveillance, and the Culture of Control.&#8221; Now the book is more important than ever. Check it out. </p>
<p><a href="http://is.gd/5Nvo6" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/5Nvo6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/01/05/airport-security-measures-and-the-politics-of-fear/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulsemedia.org/?p=18528#comment-7141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brought to you by the homeland security industry, where corporations like the Chertoff Group, one of the leading manufacturers of whole-body-imaging machines, Rapiscan Systems, could stand to make millions.

The last big high-tech scam was a lemon (&lt;a href=&quot;http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/airport-scanner-scam&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The airport scanner scam&lt;/a&gt;):

&lt;blockquote&gt;In forecasting the fate of the full-body scanners, we can turn to recent history, which saw the rapid rise—and decline—of the previous &quot;miracle&quot; screening technology. In the years following 9/11, dozens of explosive trace portals (ETPs) were installed in airports across the country, at a cost of about $160,000 each. These &quot;puffer&quot; machines—so called because they blow air on passengers to dislodge explosive particles—were once celebrated as the &quot;no-touch pat down.&quot; But in a Denver test by CBS in 2007, a network employee was sprayed with explosives and then walked through the airport’s three puffers without any trouble. The machines also set off false alarms, and they frequently broke down, leading to sky-high maintenance costs.

After spending more than $30 million on the puffer machines—most of them purchased from GE—the TSA announced earlier this year that it was suspending their use. Only about 25 percent of the machines were ever even deployed at US airports. A report last month from the Government Accountability Office found that the TSA had not adequately tested the puffers before buying them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brought to you by the homeland security industry, where corporations like the Chertoff Group, one of the leading manufacturers of whole-body-imaging machines, Rapiscan Systems, could stand to make millions.</p>
<p>The last big high-tech scam was a lemon (<a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/airport-scanner-scam" rel="nofollow">The airport scanner scam</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>In forecasting the fate of the full-body scanners, we can turn to recent history, which saw the rapid rise—and decline—of the previous &#8220;miracle&#8221; screening technology. In the years following 9/11, dozens of explosive trace portals (ETPs) were installed in airports across the country, at a cost of about $160,000 each. These &#8220;puffer&#8221; machines—so called because they blow air on passengers to dislodge explosive particles—were once celebrated as the &#8220;no-touch pat down.&#8221; But in a Denver test by CBS in 2007, a network employee was sprayed with explosives and then walked through the airport’s three puffers without any trouble. The machines also set off false alarms, and they frequently broke down, leading to sky-high maintenance costs.</p>
<p>After spending more than $30 million on the puffer machines—most of them purchased from GE—the TSA announced earlier this year that it was suspending their use. Only about 25 percent of the machines were ever even deployed at US airports. A report last month from the Government Accountability Office found that the TSA had not adequately tested the puffers before buying them.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickB</title>
		<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/01/05/airport-security-measures-and-the-politics-of-fear/#comment-7138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RickB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulsemedia.org/?p=18528#comment-7138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently in the proposed sequel the lead actor becomes a right wing politician leading the tenth largest economy on earth through a campaign engineered with a corrupt power corporation but it was found to be too unbelievable...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently in the proposed sequel the lead actor becomes a right wing politician leading the tenth largest economy on earth through a campaign engineered with a corrupt power corporation but it was found to be too unbelievable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

