<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President of Cant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulsemedia.org/2010/02/05/president-of-cant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/02/05/president-of-cant/</link>
	<description>&#34;Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hagel</title>
		<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/02/05/president-of-cant/#comment-7865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hagel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulsemedia.org/?p=20032#comment-7865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tariq Ali wrote on Turkey:

&lt;blockquote&gt;But the Saudis are also aware that any direct attack on Tehran could pose an even bigger threat to their rule, provoking Shia uprisings that might engulf them. For Riyadh, an alternative route under review in Washington is preferable—inserting Turkey into the regional equation as a Sunni–nato detachment of the empire, buttressing the Saudi petrodollars offered to Syria to break with Iran. This would serve as a counter-thrust against any future Tehran–Baghdad axis and cut off Hezbollah from Damascus&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So another words, Turkey is back on spot light thanks to House of Saud?

My brother told me once about MSM, that every writer has own agenda, and I am not quite sure what is Mr. Tariq Ali&#039;s agenda, but for me he sounds not happy about any progress made by Middle East countries, and the idea that Turkey is back into the warm by the mercy of Saudi Arabia is just silly. We are talking about two countries who have been apart almost one hundred years, and the animosity and mistrust are still thriving, but Mr. Tariq Ali believes Turkey can be used as a puppet to soothe the Sunnis. 
Turkey&#039;s recent influence in the region has to do with alot about the country&#039;s strategic and geographic place, and that you can call that a God&#039;s Mercy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tariq Ali wrote on Turkey:</p>
<blockquote><p>But the Saudis are also aware that any direct attack on Tehran could pose an even bigger threat to their rule, provoking Shia uprisings that might engulf them. For Riyadh, an alternative route under review in Washington is preferable—inserting Turkey into the regional equation as a Sunni–nato detachment of the empire, buttressing the Saudi petrodollars offered to Syria to break with Iran. This would serve as a counter-thrust against any future Tehran–Baghdad axis and cut off Hezbollah from Damascus</p></blockquote>
<p>So another words, Turkey is back on spot light thanks to House of Saud?</p>
<p>My brother told me once about MSM, that every writer has own agenda, and I am not quite sure what is Mr. Tariq Ali&#8217;s agenda, but for me he sounds not happy about any progress made by Middle East countries, and the idea that Turkey is back into the warm by the mercy of Saudi Arabia is just silly. We are talking about two countries who have been apart almost one hundred years, and the animosity and mistrust are still thriving, but Mr. Tariq Ali believes Turkey can be used as a puppet to soothe the Sunnis.<br />
Turkey&#8217;s recent influence in the region has to do with alot about the country&#8217;s strategic and geographic place, and that you can call that a God&#8217;s Mercy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President of Cant &#171; ROFTO RADIO &#8211; PALESTINE</title>
		<link>http://pulsemedia.org/2010/02/05/president-of-cant/#comment-7821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[President of Cant &#171; ROFTO RADIO &#8211; PALESTINE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulsemedia.org/?p=20032#comment-7821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] By then Obama had picked the ultra-Zionist Doberman from Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, a former volunteer for the idf, as his Chief of Staff. Once installed, Obama called, like every us President, for peace between the two suffering peoples of the Holy Land, and again, like every predecessor, for Palestinians to recognize Israel and for Israel to stop its settlements in the territories it seized in 1967. Within a week of the President’s speech in Cairo pledging opposition to further settlements, the Netanyahu coalition was extending Jewish properties in East Jerusalem with impunity. By the autumn, Secretary of State Clinton was congratulating Netanyahu on the ‘unprecedented concessions’ his government had made. Asked by Mark Landler of the New York Times, at a press conference in Jerusalem, ‘Madame Secretary, when you were here in March on the first visit, you issued a strong statement condemning the demolition of housing units in East Jerusalem. Yet, that demolition has continued unabated, and indeed, a few days ago, the mayor of the city of Jerusalem issued a new order for demolition. How would you characterize this policy today?’, she did not deign to reply. [1] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By then Obama had picked the ultra-Zionist Doberman from Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, a former volunteer for the idf, as his Chief of Staff. Once installed, Obama called, like every us President, for peace between the two suffering peoples of the Holy Land, and again, like every predecessor, for Palestinians to recognize Israel and for Israel to stop its settlements in the territories it seized in 1967. Within a week of the President’s speech in Cairo pledging opposition to further settlements, the Netanyahu coalition was extending Jewish properties in East Jerusalem with impunity. By the autumn, Secretary of State Clinton was congratulating Netanyahu on the ‘unprecedented concessions’ his government had made. Asked by Mark Landler of the New York Times, at a press conference in Jerusalem, ‘Madame Secretary, when you were here in March on the first visit, you issued a strong statement condemning the demolition of housing units in East Jerusalem. Yet, that demolition has continued unabated, and indeed, a few days ago, the mayor of the city of Jerusalem issued a new order for demolition. How would you characterize this policy today?’, she did not deign to reply. [1] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

