Libyans: Passive Tools?

August 30, 2011 § 4 Comments

Reuters

Somebody said to me recently, “The Libyans will soon be doing business with Israel, whether they like it or not.” Here we go again: the assumption that the Libyans have no agency of their own, even after they’ve so dramatically taken the initiative to change the course of their own history. Yes, Libyans took help from NATO, Qatar, and the UAE when they found themselves with no other option. This doesn’t mean they are fated to be slaves of the West. Even Iraq doesn’t do business with Israel, and Iraq has suffered a full-scale US occupation.

Such easy assumptions about the Libyan people arise from racism, usually of the unconscious, ‘well-meaning’ variety. This racism consists, first, of indifference to the people’s plight under Qaddafi, or outright denial of their plight. The rose-tinted view of life under the dictator is reminiscent of the Zionists who assure us that Gaza has swimming pools and shopping malls and that Palestinian Israelis live better than any other Arabs. The rush to highlight the crimes of the revolutionaries (sometimes relying on Qaddafi regime propaganda) is accompanied by silence over the far greater crimes of the quasi-fascist tyranny.

Libyans (and, to a degree, Syrians) are seen as passive tools in the hands of the devilishly clever White man, as childlike people who don’t know their own best interests, as people best advised to shut up and enjoy being tortured for the sake of the greater ‘anti-imperialist’ good. The right of the Libyans to life and freedom, and to make their own decisions, becomes less important than the right of certain people to feel self-righteous.

Many anti-Libyan commentators have felt free to make sweeping predictions about Libya and the Libyans without actually possessing any knowledge of the people or the country. Where now are those voices who a few weeks ago predicted so confidently the division of Libya into east and west? Or who informed us that the uprising against the tyrant was in fact a tribal civil war? Or that Tripoli would never fall because Qaddafi had so much popular support there? How do these people explain the almost immediate surrender of Qaddafi’s security forces as soon as the revolutionaries arrived in the capital, or the fact that revolutionaries rose within the capital to greet their brothers arriving from beyond, or the mass celebrations in almost every neighbourhood as soon as it became safe to express real emotions?

Beyond racism, exaggerated conspiratorial overgeneralisations are a symptom of perceived impotence. Some believe that the CIA (or whoever) is behind not only the revolutions in Libya (why the CIA would have plotted to get rid of Qaddafi I don’t know; Qaddafi was not only selling oil to Western companies, he was torturing rendered Islamists on America’s behalf and controlling cross-Mediterranean migration for the EU’s sake) and Syria, but even in Tunisia and Egypt. Such theorists believe, whether they admit it or not, that change through political action is an impossibilty, that mass mobilisations, and the courage to take on armed goons with empty hands and bare chests, cannot be real. The logical correlation of this belief is that the sole purpose of the left is to whine about the state of the world, but never to actually change anything. At the start of the 20th Century the left could have been criticised for underestimating the difficulty of establishing a fairer society; at the start of the 21st Century, sections of the left, particularly the Western left, must be criticised for the opposite.

Libyans will certainly do business with the West, just as Qaddafi did before. Libya needs to sell oil to make its economy work and to build the infrastructure that Qaddafi failed to build. (If Libyans require advanced medical treatment, they go to Tunisia – a much poorer country). Libyans will no doubt prefer to do business with the Western countries that gave them support than with such powers as Russia, which gave succour to their oppressors. If Libyans are in the driving seat, making their own decisions, this is fine. Yet certainly the danger exists that in their gratitude and amid the current chaos Libyan officials will make too many concessions to Western power. Britain, France and others will be working hard behind the scenes to ensure such an outcome, and the Libyans should be very wary.

Many of the first signs out of post-Qaddafi Libya are good. Although the Transitional Council has failed to make a strong statement against racist attacks on African migrant workers (by people who accuse every single foreigner of being a mercenary), and although Mustafa Abdul-Jalil has unwisely called for continued NATO action (until Qaddafi is captured and his remaining forces neutralised), Transitional Council officials have made clear that Libyan citizens (such as Megrahi) will not be handed over to the West. More significantly, protests have erupted in Misrata against the Transitional Council’s appointment of an ex-Qaddafi official to a security position in Tripoli. Much of the Council is made up of old regime personalities. The challenge now will be to deepen the revolution while keeping the people as unified as possible.

Like Tunisia and Egypt, Libya is in the early stages of its revolution. One thing is certain: the people are by no means passive, and are not in the mood to exchange one tyranny with another.

(Thanks to PW). And here’s Nafissa Assed’s latest piece. Nafissa reported from Tripoli for this site in the early days of the revolution. I’m very pleased that she’ll be returning home soon.

About these ads

§ 4 Responses to Libyans: Passive Tools?

  • Robin Yassin-Kassab says:

    PS – the more I hear about attacks on black African migrant workers in Libya the more horrified I am. Jasmin posted a Jazeera segment about this earlier (see below). Richard Seymour has a good piece here http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/30/libya-spectacular-revolution-disgraced-racism. There’s latent anti-black racism in every Arab society; to see it flare up in this way in Libya is horrific. Certainly Qaddafi’s racism (see the post of that title below) and his spending Libyan money on African dictators and militias, as well as his claim to be ‘king of Africa’, has exacerbated racism in Libya – but that’s no excuse. If AbdelJalil and other TNC members have any claim at all to leadership qualities they should be on Libyan TV right now telling the people to protect migrant workers. This appalling racist violence is now a bigger threat to the success of the revolution than NATO influence and Qaddafi’s forces put together. In a few weeks the world’s focus will probably have shifted away from Libya. It will be a disaster if by that time the country has become known internationally for its racism. And the bad example in Libya will negatively affect revolutions elsewhere. If the fall of Qaddafi gave a morale boost to Syrian revolutionaries, this unfocussed ‘revenge’ on black Africans, on the weak, will reinforce the fears of Syrian minorities that they will suffer if the traitor regime in Damascus falls.

  • Binh says:

    Western leftists are falling all over themselves to disown the Libyan revolution but its leadership dared to accept aid from NATO. In so doing, they show that they’d rather have a pure revolution that is crushed than an “impure” one that succeeds. Outrageous.

  • [...] Libyans as passive tools. [...]

  • this was a most interesting post, altho i take issue with many of the points made.
    i for one think that inviting nato to do anything more than enforce the no fly zone, as was the initial mission statement, was a mistake.
    having many friends in libya, none of whom are big gaddafi supporters, but they all would have rather taken gaddafi up on his offer months ago of an ‘open election in six months’ than have libya suffer the onslaught of nato.
    now many of these are in greater fear of the rebels than they had been of gaddafi. his was a predictable sort of iron fist. whereas the chaos they live with now is far more disturbing to them.
    so, never thought the libyan people are tools. nor ignorant of the wicked ways of the west. but the revolution looks more each day like a civil uprising wherein one side was aided by foreign powers with ulterior motives.
    enjoyed reading
    will have to check back often

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Libyans: Passive Tools? at P U L S E.

meta

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,659 other followers

%d bloggers like this: