Obama Administration Silencing Pakistani Drone-Strike Lawyer

by Medea Benjamin

Shahzad Akbar (left) with Karim Khan, a resident of North Waziristan whose 18-year-old son and 35-year-old brother were killed in a CIA drone strike which destroyed his family home. (Reuters)

When is the last time you heard from a civilian victim of the CIA’s secret drone strikes? Sure, most of them can’t speak because they’re deceased. But many leave behind bereaved and angry family members ready to proclaim their innocence and denounce the absence of due process, the lack of accountability, the utter impunity with which the U.S. government decides who will live and die.

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government has increasingly deployed unmanned drones in the Middle East, South Asia and Africa. While drones were initially used for surveillance, these remotely controlled aerial vehicles are now routinely used to launch missiles against human targets in countries where the United States is not at war, including Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. As many as 3,000 people, including hundreds of civilians and even American citizens, have been killed in such covert missions.

The U.S. government will not even acknowledge the existence of the covert drone program, much less account for those who are killed and maimed. And you don’t hear their stories on FOX News, or even MSNBC. The U.S. media has little interest in airing the stories of dirt poor people in faraway lands who contradict the convenient narrative that drone strikes only kill “militants.”

But in Pakistan, where most strikes have occurred, the victims do have someone speaking out on their behalf. Shahzad Akbar, a Pakistani lawyer who co-founded the human rights organization Foundation for Fundamental Right, filed the first case in Pakistan on behalf of family members of civilian victims and has become a critical force in litigating and advocating for drone victims.

Akbar is by no means anti-American. He has traveled to the United States in the past, and has even worked for the U.S. government. He was a consultant with the U.S. Agency for International Development, and helped the FBI investigate a terrorism case involving a Pakistani diplomat.

But his relationship with the US government changed in 2010, when he took on the case of Karim Khan, a resident of a small town in North Waziristan who claimed that his 18-year-old son and 35-year-old brother were killed when a CIA-operated drone struck his family home.

“Khan could have responded by taking up arms and joining the Taliban. Instead, he put his trust in the legal system,” Akbar told me in an interview from Islamabad. Akbar helped Khan sue the CIA and the US Secretary of Defense for the wrongful deaths of his relatives. Since then, dozens of families have come forward and joined the legal proceedings.

According to the New America Foundation, from 2004-2011, between 1,717 and 2,680 individuals were killed in Pakistan by drone strikes, and of those, between 293 and 471 were civilians. The UK-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism puts those figures higher, saying that some 3,000 have been killed, including between 391 and 780 civilians.

Akbar disputes even the Bureau’s figures, claiming that the vast majority of those killed are ordinary civilians. “Most of the victims who are labeled militants might be Taliban sympathizers but they are not involved in any criminal or terrorist acts,” Akbar said. “The Americans often use the fact that someone carries a weapon as proof they’re a combatant. If that’s the criteria then the US will have to commit genocide, because all men in that area carry AK-47s. It’s part of their culture.”

Now that Akbar has become the voice of drone victims, it appears that the Obama administration is trying to silence him.

He was invited to speak at a human rights symposium at Columbia University’s law school in May 2011, but he never received a visa. Despite repeated enquiries, he was merely told there was “a problem” with his application. Now he has been invited to speak at the first ever Drone Summit on April 28-29 in Washington DC, organized by the peace group CODEPINK and the legal advocacy organizations Reprieve and the Center for Constitutional Rights. Once again, his visa remains stuck in the never-never land of  “administrative review.”

The Summit organizers have appealed for help from the State Department, key members of Congress and the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan. After looking into the case, U.S. Deputy Ambassador to Pakistan Richard Hoagland responded: “Whether we like it or not, the current U.S. visa system faces significant constraints within the Homeland Security structure.”  Insisting that the issuance of visas was not used as an ideological tool but was a reflection of “complicated and even byzantine laws and regulations,” Hoagland concluded, “I fully sympathize, but I cannot change law and regulation.” His recommendation? “Continued patience.”

“The Obama administration has already launched six times as many drone strikes as the Bush administration in Pakistan alone, killing hundreds of innocent people and devastating families,” said Leili Kashani, Advocacy Program Manager at the Center for Constitutional Rights, one of Summit sponsors. “By refusing to grant Shahzad Akbar a visa to speak at the Summit, the Obama administration is further silencing discussion about the impact of its targeted killing program on people in Pakistan and around the world.”

The Drone Summit’s organizers vow to keep pressuring the U.S. government to grant Akbar a visa and are encouraging their supporters to contact Consul General Steve Maloney in Pakistan. If all fails, they will have Akbar speak, via satellite, at a press conference at the National Press Club on Thursday, April 26, just before the Summit begins.

“Our legal challenges disrupt the narrative of ‘precision strikes’ against ‘high-value targets’ as an unqualified success against terrorism, at minimal cost to civilian life,” said Akbar, “The CIA does not want anyone challenging their killing spree, but the American people should have the right to know.”

Medea Benjamin, cofounder of CODEPINK and Global Exchange, is author of the new book Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote ControlRegister here for the Drone Summit on April 28-29.

2 thoughts on “Obama Administration Silencing Pakistani Drone-Strike Lawyer”

  1. This writer, Medea Benjamin, is so full of garbage it is even over the top for “PULSE”! The United States and NATO are at war in 20 different countries, due to the redefination of combatants! I am bigmikecraft, and I do not need to use a phoney email name. I have fought in the field and on contract, and the United States should actually have a ground force in Africa. Stupid writers like this Medea Benjamin, wish to have Mohamaud Omar Al Bashir in power in The Sudan, but don’t want the USA or NATO to kill him. You want him to keep up the slaughter of, as of right now, 1.2 million of his people, rather than send in the 101st. airborn to kill him and maybe 10,000 of his troops, in 4 weeks! The United States will eventually get a Lyndon Johnson style President in the Whitehouse, and he will go back to the draft, put a low cost 1 million man army, in the field, spread out in non-com 4 division units, and put an end to all the violence. I was in Saigon, and Richard Nixon was a poop head, to be polite and not swear. The only thing the World got out of an American pull out was 4 million dead in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, within 5 years after 1975-April! You non users of guns always amaze me. You can not fathom that security in 3rd. world nations is up to the larger nations, because small ethnic nations in Africa and the mid and far east take much time to evolve. The colonial powers brought peace to a rabid Africa and ran away! Did you all think that the ZULU were an actual nation. They were a vicious tribe of cattle herders only. Governments need order and an economy. Where are the big mouths for MALI right now! I can take back that nation with the French Foreign Legion and air support right now, in 10 days! Where is Nigeria and the other larger nations right now. They will sit around and twiddle their thumbs, as will Mr. Obama. Obama has not figured out that the cost of the war was contractors and foreign aide. That could have been stopped! An American soldier gets paid the same whether he sits on his behind states side or goes to war, plus his 8000 combat pay. Quit paying out money to indigent foreign personal! The Taliban will march right back in, as the Vietcong did, as soon as the American Forces are gone. Grow up, Drones must be used against all the new combatants in civilial muslum attire, in those nations! Please grow up, because as an Angelo American, I am not going to let our nation keep being led by a few college boys who have never fired a gun! Barack Obama has never fired a gun. It is suprising that he is doing as good a job as he has done. It was George Bush Sr., who claimed to be a WW2 hero, that did not understand war! All he had to do is put a small marine strike force, with a few Harriers in Kuwait, and Saddam would never have crossed the border. Saddam would have never shot at an American on the Kuwait border but the coward Bush Family, who have been nothing but Texas Oil flunkies, all their lives, did not know how to be a General! The American curse is that a real man can not get elected. War is hell, and the sooner that all realize that a few deaths now, keep the terrible dead millions of populations of war from happening later! Sincerely bigmikecraft

  2. bigmikecraft! You need one of those hell-fire missiles from the predator drones fired up your ass to retune your bearings pal. Murder of one or one million is Murder and there is no justification. Medea Benjamin should be praised and appreciated for bringing to light that the corrupt corporate media is so shamelessly censoring. Respect Medea for your work!

Leave a reply to bigmikecraft Cancel reply