From Vanunu to the New Jew

Mordechai Vanunu breaks the rules
Mordechai Vanunu breaks the rules

I cannot keep silent … Disaster follows disaster; the land lies in ruins … My people are fools; they do not know me.” Jeremiah 4:19

Mordechai Vanunu is a Moroccan Jew, born in Marrakesh. Today he credits his humanity to having been born in an Arab country rather than in the Jewish state. He was nine when he was taken to Israel. He attended an ultra orthodox school, and after his military service became a nuclear technician at the Dimona plant. At this time his anti-Zionist politics developed. Later he flirted with Buddhism, converted to Christianity, and in London in 1986 told the Sunday Times what he knew of Israel’s nuclear weapons programme, backing his claims with photographic evidence.

He was then caught in a ‘honey trap’, lured by a beautiful woman from London to Italy, drugged and kidnapped in Rome by Mossad (with the connivance of British, French and Italian intelligence services), and brought back to Israel, where he served 18 years in prison for his truth-telling, twelve of them in solitary confinement. He says he survived because of his strong will (“the first thing I did in prison was give up smoking”), and by playing opera records. He refused to converse with the only human beings available – his guards. His lawyer describes him as “the most stubborn, principled, and tough person I have ever met.”

Out of prison, Vanunu is still imprisoned, forbidden to leave the state he so loathes, and not allowed to meet or even email foreigners. When I and several other foreigners met him in an east Jerusalem restaurant, I asked him, “Can I say we’ve met you? Will you get in trouble?” He thrust his arm skyward in a very Moroccan way: “Yes! Yes, I will have trouble. I don’t care about trouble. Let them make trouble!”

This was the end of an incredibly emotional week. I was physically and mentally exhausted from late nights, early mornings, and the slow absorption of what I was experiencing. I’d been weeping in the streets on a couple of occasions, and I’m not a particularly weepy kind of guy. Tonight our final Palfest event, at the Palestine National Theatre, had been closed down by Israeli troops, we’d relocated to read at the British Council garden, and then we’d eaten and danced. And another early start tomorrow – but Vanunu was across the table. Like everything else during my visit to occupied Palestine, meeting Vanunu was an experience worth being awake for.

I ordered another Taybeh beer and we started talking. Before long I was sitting next to him, putting my arm around his shoulders and telling him I wished I could have held his hand during those years when he was alone.

Vanunu is a proud Christian. His discourse is unrelentingly harsh on ‘the Jewish’, for their opposition to democracy, their brutality, their lack of humanity. Gently, indirectly, I hinted he might be wrong to generalise so. I mentioned Ilan Pappe and the Neturei Karta – fine examples, secular and religious, of Jewish opposition to Zionism. Next to us was a French Jew, a very intelligent academic, who had earlier said the obvious very clearly: Zionism has to be defeated, by force if necessary.

Vanunu liked the people I mentioned, but still didn’t like ‘the Jewish’. In awe of the man’s suffering, knowing that he has been tortured by the self-proclaimed Jewish state, I didn’t argue further.

It made me consider the tragedy of this people, the Israeli Jews, who have driven themselves into such a dark corner. The notable exceptions – people like Amira Hass, Gideon Levy, Jeff Halper – really are exceptions; and then there are the rest, over 90%, who support Israel’s right to be an ethno-state on the ruins of the pluralistic, ancient society that was here before, and who believe regular massacres of Arabs to be necessary.

I didn’t visit the theatre in Tel Aviv or have dinner in Ashkelon, so I don’t claim to be an Israel expert; but what I saw of the Israeli Jews in east Jerusalem, and manning the checkpoints in the West Bank, was quite unlike what I’ve seen of Jews elsewhere. These people were ugly, physically speaking. The Jews are not renowned for ugliness. But these people looked like oppressors, and they looked like oppressors who know what they are.

Vanunu refuses to speak Hebrew. He lives alone, in east Jerusalem. Israeli Jewish society considers him a traitor. Only one member of his large family will speak to him. The Palestinians are friendly to him and often invite him into their homes, but he politely refuses, explaining that he can’t tell who is a collaborator and who isn’t. He knows the state is following him, and he knows there are many Palestinians who – for money or drugs or to keep the silence of a blackmailer – help the state. What he does all day, every day, is walk – “from the checkpoint to the wall, from the wall to the checkpoint.”

Suheir Hammad told me it took her several visits to Palestine before she summoned enough courage to visit her family’s town, Lydda, one of the towns ethnically cleansed in 1948. But once in Israel proper she relaxed a little. When she saw how badly Israeli Jews treat each other, it became less personal. For they too are suffering: you can’t be happy when you torture others, not really happy. Wifebeaters may look happy in the pub, but they aren’t. According to a British Pakistani friend, someone who worked at a West Bank university and spent plenty of time in Tel Aviv, the only glue holding Israeli Jews together is their hatred of the natives. His argument is repeated by Eva Figes, whose ‘Journey to Nowhere’ I’ve just read. This compulsive memoir of a German Jewish family’s forced migration to London is eloquent in its denunciation of Zionism, and also of American pro-Zionist but anti-Jewish immigration policy following World War Two. The family’s housemaid Edith, a survivor of Nazi Berlin, spends a decade in Palestine-Israel before coming to London. Why had she left? Because in Israel, “everyone hates everyone else.”

Eva Figes writes: “The New Jew looked like someone out of a Leni Riefenstahl film, handsome in a Hellenic sort of way. The New Jew struck out first, was secretly ashamed of those who had allowed themselves to be killed without a struggle, and so rejected them, even though using them for his own political ends. The ideals of the New Jew who set out to create Israel after the war were remarkably similar to his mirror image, the old Nazi. Not a good omen for the future.

7 thoughts on “From Vanunu to the New Jew”

  1. Quite a picture you paint. Thank you for sharing. Having read Jack Berenstein’s articles a few years ago, it is like you just moved forward his depiction to today. I have often felt this is a sad messy society full of angst, self created. Last week I read, and published, the revelations of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, made in 1974. It all fits so well, describing an unhappy people due to internal corruption.

  2. great post, robin, and quite an accurate description. it falls in line with the accurate portrayal of zionist colonists in max blumenthal’s video the other day. there are very few exceptions, as you point out, but the problem with those exceptions is that they don’t actively resist to tear down the jewish state whereas in south africa whites who opposed apartheid did. this is quite a troubling difference for me. there were only “dozens” of zionist colonists, for instance, who held a demonstration against the nakba law last week. this speaks volumes.

  3. Great post, Robin. Hannah Arendt had it right in her observation about all colonial occupations, that “… though tyranny, because it needs no consent, may successfully rule over foreign peoples, it can stay in power only if it destroys first of all the national institutions of its own people.” Of course, Palestinians are indigenous, they aren’t “foreign”, but the point remains that israeli society is putrifying, perhaps will even implode eventually, because of what is it wreaking upon the peoples it has brutally occupied and displaced.

  4. I read the article with interest, but the author’s bigotry and despise for Israeli Jews (and others) is thinly veiled. Mordechai turned against himself, against who he is, (Jewish by birth), something not uncommon to many oppressed peoples who would rather integrate with the majority. Zionism simply means that Israel has a right to exist. After WW II, it became clear that Jewish people needed a country of their own, a place of safety. Unfortunately, the new / old “homeland” is surrounded by Arabs raised from their youth to hate Jews! Is Israel a tense country? Yes, most definitely. Should Israelis displace the Palestine people and families who have already resided in West Bank areas for centuries? No, of course not! Nor should they invite Jewish people from all over the world to come live there, as thousands of non-Jewish Russians have settled in, only increasing the tension. Israel needs to recognize that it has limited resources, and consistent crowding and growth beyond dangerous borders will only increase internal tensions. And the surrounding Arab countries need to work with Israel, not teach hatred in their schools!

    This article was thinly disguised bigotry. Mordechai could have openly disagreed with government policies and spoken out about the oppression within and without. He could have been an instigator for change, for more humanitarian treatment of Palestinian residents. I admire that he stuck to his principles, but advocating for possible violence and carrying hatred within will never help the Israeli / Palestine conflict.

  5. If you find bigotry in the article, I can’t really help you, except to say that a reasonable person wouldn’t.

    “After WW II, it became clear that Jewish people needed a country of their own.” – Well, we learn from history what we want to. Again, I think a reasonable person would learn a different lesson – that basing a state on a notion of ethnicity is a disastrous idea which leads very quickly to ethnic cleansing and war.

    “Should Israelis displace the Palestine people and families who have already resided in West Bank areas for centuries?” It’s generous of you to answer in the negative. Unfortunately your facts are not straight. The Palestinians have not lived on the West Bank for centuries, but for millenia. They are not the same as the Arabs of desert Arabia who arrived with Islam. They are Arab-Canaanites. At one point many or most of them followed the Jewish religion. Read Shlomo Sand. Next, they weren’t resticted to the West Bank. They lived in the 78% of Palestine which Zionists and their friends now call Israel, also for millenia. In 1947 and 1948 80% of the Palestinians in this area were ethnically cleansed. Read Ilan Pappe. Even if the lesson of the second world war and Hitlerian anti-semitism is that Jews must live in a Jewish ethno-state (and this isn’t the lesson of WW2; what it is is a late, ironic victory for fascism) then I don’t think by any stretch of logic or morality that Jews should establish this state in a land which belongs to another people, in which Jews, before the waves of Zionist immigration, made up less than 4% of the population. To think otherwise is bigotry of the worst sort. And most Israeli Jews do think otherwise, not for genetic reasons but as a result of their conditioning by Zionist education, media and military service, and by virtue of living in such a weird and unsustainable apartheid environment.

    As for Arab countries teaching hatred in their schools, I can assure you that the Arab peoples are far more anti-Zionist than their dictators or the people who write the state textbooks, and this is for obvious reasons. Zionist invaders have stolen the land of Palestine, driven the Palestinian people into refugee camps and ghettoes, massacred them repeatedly and invaded and bombed neighbouring countries over and over again.

    Now please go away and post hasbara somewhere where it’ll be appreciated.

  6. Vanunu, by the way, was imprisoned not for disagreeing with policies but for telling the truth about Zionism’s nuclear arsenal. By doing so he provided a great service to the world. Nuclear weapons are dangerous at the best of times. In the hands of a murderous apartheid state which has violated tens of UN resolutions, invaded its neighbours at will, and which wins 94% domestic support (amongst Israeli Jews) for such savage and entirely gratuitous massacres as the one on Gaza a couple of years ago, they are a clear and present danger.

    Putting someone in solitary confinement for 12 years for telling the truth to a journalist is the behaviour of a squalid neo-fascist regime destined for the dustbin of history. I hope soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: